Bibliographic record
Abstract
PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2001Seismic interpretation of sonic logsAuthors: Jonathan BorkLawrence C. WoodJonathan BorkApache Corporation and Lawrence C. WoodGeophysical Consulting Inc.https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1816660 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1816660FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByMultichannel Semi-blind Deconvolution (MSBD) of seismic signalsSignal Processing, Vol. 135A prestack basis pursuit seismic inversionRui Zhang, Mrinal K Sen, and Sanjay Srinivasan10 December 2012 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 78, No. 1A pre-stack basis pursuit seismic inversionRui Zhang, Mrinal K Sen, and Sanjay Srinivasan25 October 2012Seismic sparse-layer reflectivity inversion using basis pursuit decompositionGEOPHYSICS, Vol. 76, No. 6 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2001ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2001 Pages: 2135 publication data© 2001 Copyright © 2001 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished: 03 Jan 2005 CITATION INFORMATION Jonathan Bork and Lawrence C. Wood, (2001), "Seismic interpretation of sonic logs," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 510-513. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1816660 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".