A new genus and species from the North Atlantic,<i>Archestenogramma profundum</i>(Phyllophoraceae, Rhodophyta), with taxonomic resolution of the orphaned<i>Leptofauchea brasiliensis</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A recent collection of a red alga from Bermuda showed great similarities to Leptofauchea brasiliensis from Brazil, providing the impetus for a morphological and anatomical evaluation of the two. Based on these studies, the two appear to be congeneric. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of the Bermudian plants showed them to be to be a new genus and species of the Phyllophoraceae (Gigartinales), Archestenogramma profundum C.W. Schneider, Chengsupanimit & G.W. Saunders. In light of our anatomical observations, our phylogenetic results also proved instructive as to the disposition of L. brasiliensis, a species that was suggested to be incorrectly assigned to the Rhodymeniales for over a quarter of a century and even recently excluded from Leptofauchea. The morphological and anatomical similarity of L. brasiliensis to A. profundum suggested its movement from the Faucheaceae to a new taxonomic placement in the Phyllophoraceae, as A. brasiliense (A.B. Joly) C.W. Schneider, Chengsupanimit & G.W. Saunders, comb. nov.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".