MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Post-varicella arteriopathy of childhood

2005· review· en· W2086980416 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvain Lanthier, Derek Armstrong, Trish Domi, Gabrielle deVeber

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMoyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStenosisStroke (engine)Internal medicinePediatric strokeCardiologyInternal carotid arteryMagnetic resonance angiographySurgeryRadiologyMagnetic resonance imagingIschemiaIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To determine the course of vascular changes in childhood post-varicella arteriopathy (PVA) and its relationship to recurrent arterial ischemic stroke or TIA (AIS/TIA). METHODS: Subjects were children with AIS/TIA occurring <1 year after varicella, ischemic localization consistent with unilateral disease affecting the supraclinoid internal carotid artery or proximal anterior or middle cerebral arteries, and no identified AIS/TIA etiology other than PVA. Charts, brain MRI, and sequential cerebral vessel imaging (selective cerebral angiography or MR angiography [SCA/MRA]) were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-three children had varicella at age 1.0 to 10.4 years and had single or multiple AIS/TIAs 4 to 47 weeks later. Initial SCA/MRA was performed within 1 month of presentation, and each child had one to five repeat SCA/MRAs during a 4- to 87-month period. There was vascular stenosis in 19 children, maximal on initial studies in 15 of these. Subsequent stenosis regression occurred in 17 children. In 11 of these, one or two additional SCA/MRAs showed further regression as long as 48 months after presentation; there was no restenosis. Eight of 23 children had recurrent AIS/TIA with antithrombotic therapy within 33 weeks of presentation, including 1 of 17 children with documented stenosis regression. CONCLUSION: Vascular stenosis of childhood post-varicella arteriopathy takes a monophasic course, generally with subsequent stenosis regression and only occasional stenosis progression after arterial ischemic stroke/TIA. Arterial ischemic stroke/TIA rarely recurs with antithrombotic prophylaxis after stenosis regression occurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations134
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicMoyamoya disease diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207