Information needs of adolescents when a mother is diagnosed with breast cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This pilot study was undertaken to increase our understanding of the information needs of adolescents when a mother is diagnosed with breast cancer. In-depth interviews with 13 adolescents provided insight into the types of questions they had at the time of their mother's diagnosis and how satisfied they were with the access they had to information. These adolescents had many questions about cancer and its treatment, specific questions about their mother's disease and survival, and concerns about their own risk. Each sought information on their own in addition to conversations with one or both parents. They identified their most pressing concern as the need to know about their mother's survival. All felt it was important to have access to information and to have someone with whom they could talk about what was happening. This person needed to be someone with whom they were comfortable and whom, in turn, had both credibility and comfort with emotions. Clearly, adolescents experience needs for information when their mother is diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer nurses can assist women diagnosed with breast cancer plan how to support their adolescent children and meet the needs for information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".