MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087026787 · doi:10.1353/utq.2011.0115

We Are All Treaty People: Prairie Essays (review)

2011· article· en· W2087026787 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Daniel Heath Justice

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreatyIndigenousAllianceKinshipScholarshipPoliticsMainstreamNarrativePolitical scienceEconomic JusticeSociologyLawArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: We Are All Treaty People: Prairie Essays Daniel Heath Justice (bio) Roger Epp . We Are All Treaty People: Prairie Essays. University of Alberta Press. 2008. xii, 236. $26.95 Fears of Canada's national fabric being unwoven by gaping cultural divides seem to be almost de rigeur in political, popular, and even academic conversations. The culprits are predictable: indigenous vs settler, rural vs urban, eastern Canada vs western Canada, Tim Hortons vs Starbucks. Certainly there are long and legitimate grievances that have emerged as a result of the nation-building project of Canada. Yet, too [End Page 295] often, the predictable claims to unbridgeable cultural divides between various constituencies in Canada obscures an equally significant truth: there is much that connects us in bonds of history, alliance, affinity, experience, and kinship. It is toward an honest understanding of our complicated interdependencies and conflicting interconnections that Roger Epp offers his rough and tender truths of life in the Canadian prairies. We Are All Treaty People: Prairie Essays is a collection that is simultaneously deeply moving and discomfiting; though carefully researched and elegantly written, its most significant narrative strength comes from its author's perhaps constitutional unwillingness to indulge in the easy obscurantism of mainstream cultural commentary. This is a rare and very welcome quality, one that more contemporary scholarship could profitably emulate. These essays are about what it is to belong to a place - in this case, the prairies - and how our understandings of that belonging are shaped by the dreams, betrayals, ideals, legacies, and frequently vexed relationships between various peoples and their interwoven histories. Farmers and students, professors and politicians, populists, cowboys, Indians, writers - all abide in a shared land with different meanings, inheritances, and futures. Together, Epp notes, the essays 'are exercises not in theory, at least not directly, but rather in attentiveness - to a necessary geography, to place, story and family, to the contemporary challenges of living well in that part of the rural West that was once called the prairie grainbelt.' Whether taking up some of the wounded histories of European settlement of the prairie, agrarian policy, class struggle, or the challenges of intercultural connection, these are not the observations of a presumptuous urbanite or an interloping Easterner ready to tell prairie people all about themselves; rather, Epp's essays offer the fiercely empathetic and deeply considered understandings of a man intimately tied to both the physical landscape and its representational (and sometimes spectral) influence on those who call it home. Take, for instance, the title essay, 'We Are All Treaty People: History, Reconciliation, and the 'Settler Problem." It would perhaps be easy for Epp, 'a fourth-generation settler on the Canadian prairies,' to take what are still the conventional approaches to Indigenous-settler issues: ignore the history and continuing traumas of colonialism, blame Aboriginal peoples for the effects of those traumas, or put on the hair shirt of intergenerational guilt. Epp does none of these. Instead, he argues on behalf of unflinchingly honest relationship, which 'constitutes an equally powerful history, inherited, not chosen, whose birthright we can either disavow, because its burdens seem too great, or else make our own through respectful initiatives.' We are all treaty people, with all the attendant difficulties and possibilities of such a connection. [End Page 296] Treaties, after all, are relational; they are relationships of rights and obligations between peoples. He does not imagine that reconciliation is an easy thing, nor does he assume that the very real conflicts of the past and present will conveniently resolve themselves and let us feel good about how well we can get along. We have to work at these relationships, and it is challenging work, as anything enduring tends to be. But, he affirms, there are shared circumstances between rural settler communities and reserve communities, as well as 'cultural correspondences that can be bridges for coexistence.' Understanding is possible only through both acknowledging and recognizing those connections, 'the common ground for treaty peoples whose inheritance is filled with mixed blessings . . . and obligations of memory and relationship on all sides.' In these prairie essays from rural Canada, Roger Epp reminds us that connection across and within difference is never easy, and it...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.010
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207