MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087027772 · doi:10.1177/0278364913478897

The Canadian planetary emulation terrain 3D mapping dataset

2013· article· en· W2087027772 on OpenAlexaffabout
Chi Hay Tong, David Gingras, Kevin Larose, Timothy D. Barfoot, Érick Dupuis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Robotics Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space AgencyInstitute for Christian StudiesUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerrainEmulationScripting languageComputer scienceRoboticsArtificial intelligenceField (mathematics)Panning (audio)RobotComputer visionComputer graphics (images)EngineeringCartographyGeographyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a collection of 272 three-dimensional laser scans gathered at two unique planetary analogue rover test facilities in Canada, which offer emulated planetary terrain at manageable scales for algorithmic development. This dataset is subdivided into four individual subsets, each gathered using panning laser rangefinders on different mobile rover platforms. This data should be of interest to field robotics researchers developing rover navigation algorithms suitable for use in three-dimensional, unstructured, natural terrain. All of the data are presented in human-readable text files, and are accompanied by Matlab parsing scripts to facilitate use thereof. This paper provides an overview of the available data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of Robotics ResearchSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207