<i>LeAbsi1</i> gene expression regulation by various abiotic and oxidative stresses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A full-length LeAbsi1 cDNA was isolated from the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) plant. Phylogenetic analysis was performed, based on the deduced amino acid sequence of the LeAbsi1 cDNA and revealed high amino acid identity (AAID) to unknown proteins in Solanum melongena (87% AAID) and Petunia integrifolia (80% AAID). LeAbsi1 shares high sequence identity with a zinc finger (C2H2-type) family protein from Arabidopsis (53% AAID) and the CaAbsi1 protein in Capsicum annuum (49% AAID). Expression of the LeAbsi1 gene under abiotic and oxidative stresses was investigated in this study, including exposure to the conditions of 200 mM NaCl, 200 mM mannitol, cold temperature (4°C), 100 µM abscisic acid (ABA), 10 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and 50 µMM methyl vilogen (MV). LeAbsi1 was significantly induced after a 3 h exposure to NaCl, mannitol and low temperature treatment. Its transcripts also accumulated strongly after plant hormone ABA treatment for 1 h. Moreover, LeAbsi1 was significantly induced by MV treatments after 6 h. These observations suggest that the LeAbsi1 gene plays a role in both abiotic and oxidative stress responses.Key words: Abiotic stress, LeAbsi1, tomato, oxidative stress
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".