An Autophagic Vacuolar Myopathy-Like Disorder Presenting as Nonimmune Hydrops in a Female Fetus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 37-year-old woman presented for routine obstetrical care at 15 weeks' gestational age and the fetus was found to have hydrops fetalis. Following elective termination of the pregnancy at 18 weeks' gestational age, pathologic examination of the female conceptus revealed findings suggestive of a lysosomal storage disease within the liver and cardiac muscle. Enzyme assays for beta-galactosidase, neuraminidase, alpha-l-iduronidase, beta-glucuronidase, beta-glucosidase, Morquio disease type A enzyme, beta-fucosidase, alpha-mannosidase, and beta-mannosidase were all normal, ruling out many of the common storage diseases. Electron microscopy identified vacuoles within hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, and cardiac myocytes resembling the autophagic vacuoles characteristic of a group of diseases known as the autophagic vacuolar myopathies (AVMs). Because these diseases are exceptionally rare in females, and because such autophagic vacuoles have never before been described in liver, we propose a novel entity of "AVM-like lysosomal storage disease" presenting as nonimmune hydrops in a female fetus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".