DURATION OF SKIN PHOTOSENSITIVITY AND INCIDENCE OF PHOTOSENSITIVITY REACTIONS AFTER ADMINISTRATION OF VERTEPORFIN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Verteporfin (Visudyne, Novartis AG) is a light-activated drug that reduces the risk of vision loss in patients with certain types of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Because photosensitivity can occur with photosensitizers, it is important for ophthalmologists providing verteporfin therapy to understand its time course and duration, as well as the incidence of photosensitivity reactions. METHODS: Data were obtained from three sources: 1) the time course of skin photosensitivity in 17 volunteers by measuring erythema/edema over time after verteporfin, using red light exposure; 2) the duration of skin photosensitivity in 30 patients with skin cancer by exposing skin to simulated solar light and calculating the daily minimal erythematous dose; and 3) the incidences of photosensitivity reactions as recorded in three phase III trials in patients with CNV secondary to age-related macular degeneration or pathologic myopia who received the regimen of verteporfin therapy currently approved by regulatory authorities (infusion of 6 mg/m(2) body surface area). RESULTS: 1) Skin photosensitivity was high at the first timepoint of 1.5 hours after dosing and decreased rapidly thereafter; 2) the duration of skin photosensitivity was dose dependent, ranging from 2.0 to 6.7 days at 6 to 20 mg/m(2), respectively (mean of 2 days at a dose of 6 mg/m(2)); and 3) photosensitivity reactions occurred in only 2.2% of patients in the phase III trials, including two severe events, one secondary to extravasation. All treatment-related reactions in the phase III trials occurred within the first 2 days after dosing, with the exception of two mild reactions and one moderate reaction that occurred 3 days after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Verteporfin is associated with short-lived photosensitivity and a low incidence of photosensitivity reactions in clinical trials, most of which could probably have been avoided by adherence to protocol instructions for skin protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".