Safety of Same Day Discharge Radial PCI in Patients Under and Over 75 Years of Age
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To check the safety of same day discharge radial PCI in patients under or over 75 years of age. A total of 943 patients who had same day discharge radial PCI between April 1998 and March 2001 were contacted. Patient health status, entry site complications, and repeat interventions during the first month after the procedure were compared in patients under 75 years of age (< 75) with those 75 or over (> or = 75). Responses were received from 811 patients (694 aged < 75 and 117 aged > or = 75 years). Two hundred and thirty-eight patients (34.3%) aged < 75 years and 36 patients (30.7%) aged > or = 75years reported one or more access site complications during the first 24 hours postdischarge, and 105 (15.1%) and 12 patients (10.3%), respectively, during the first month, (P > 0.05). However, all complications in both groups were minor and none of the patients required admission to the hospital. During the first 24 hours postdischarge only one patient (0.1%) aged < 75 years had a repeat angiogram showing a normal patent vessel, while during the first month 4 patients (0.6%) aged < 75 years and none aged > or = 75 years had target vessel closure. Out of the 132 patients who did not respond to our questionnaire, 1 patient aged < 75 and 1 patient aged > or = 75 years had subacute stent thrombosis within a month and died. There were no major entry site complications, and target vessel closure (0.6% versus 0.7%) was similar in patients aged < 75 and > or = 75 years. Thus, same day discharge radial PCI is safe in patients 75 years old or over.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".