MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087109509 · doi:10.1002/cctc.201590007

Inside Cover: New Catalyst Series from the Sol–Gel‐Entrapment of Gold Nanoparticles in Organically Modified Silica Matrices: Proof of Performance in a Model Oxidation Reaction (ChemCatChem 2/2015)

2015· paratext· en· W2087109509 on OpenAlexaff
Rosaria Ciriminna, Alexandra Fidalgo, Valerica Pandarus, François Béland, Laura M. Ilharco, Mario Pagliaro

Bibliographic record

VenueChemCatChem · 2015
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsSiliCycle (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisColloidal goldHydrogen peroxideNanoparticleOrmosilNanotechnologyChemical engineeringMatrix (chemical analysis)Heterogeneous catalysisCover (algebra)Materials scienceSol-gelChemistryOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cover picture shows the TEM pictures of new gold nanoparticles confined in the ORMOSIL matrix of SiliaCat Au catalyst as background, with superimposed reaction scheme for the model oxidation of 1-phenylethanol with hydrogen peroxide. In their Full Paper, L. M. Ilharco, M. Pagliaro and co-workers explain why and how this new catalyst series is ideally suited for the practical utilization of sol-gel encapsulated gold nanoparticles in a number of different reactions. The catalyst has a huge surface area and has been extensively characterized. The article highlighted by this cover can be found on p. 254 ff. of Issue 2, 2015.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemCatChemSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207