MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087128431 · doi:10.1080/02568540009594759

Hyperbole and Humor in Children's Language Play

2000· article· en· W2087128431 on OpenAlex
Donna Varga

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Research in Childhood Education · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLanguage, Metaphor, and Cognition
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHyperboleDevelopmental psychologyContext (archaeology)Scope (computer science)AssertionLinguisticsCognitionLanguage developmentCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study examines the processes by which preschool children initiate, organize, and maintain language play interactions. The language behaviors examined are verbal hyperbole, whereby play interactions are initiated by a child's assertion of extraordinary ability, with subsequent responses between participants enlarging the scope of the claim. As children voice incongruities of greater proportion, the emotional climate of the play is heightened and ingenious verbal representations are provoked. From the analysis, developmental features of hyperbolic language play are identified, and language play is contextualized within the broader context of children's social play interactions. The observations portray the wide scope of 4- and 5-year-olds' abilities to engage in conceptual language play activity, with 4- and 5-year-olds differing from each other, and potentially in advance of traditionally expected preoperational abilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it