MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087129854 · doi:10.1139/p11-086

Tipping time of a holonomic quantum cylinder

2011· article· en· W2087129854 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mark R. A. Shegelski, Jamie Sanchez-Fortún Stoker, Ian Kellett

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum chaos and dynamical systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDimensionless quantityQuantumCylinderHamiltonian (control theory)RADIUSClassical mechanicsHolonomicMathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The classical and quantum mechanical Hamiltonians for a cylinder subject to holonomic constraints are derived. The quantum mechanical Hamiltonian is simplified and cast into a dimensionless form. The tipping time of a quantum mechanical cylinder subject to gravity is calculated. Numerical solutions for an appropriate initial wave function are obtained. We find that the tipping time is given by 〈t〉 tip = t 0 C 1 exp [C 2 (r/r 0 ) 9 ], where t 0 is the time scale, C 1 and C 2 are constants of order unity, r is the radius of the cylinder, and r 0 is the length scale for the tipping. We compare our results with those found in previous works.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsFrench-language works237,207