MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087167594 · doi:10.1002/jcb.20975

Proteolytic processing of a sea urchin, ECM‐localized protein into lower mol mass species possessing collagen‐cleavage activity

2006· article· en· W2087167594 on OpenAlexaff
John J. Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Biochemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea urchinCleavage (geology)GelatinProteaseBenzamidineChemistryExtracellular matrixBiochemistryCell biologySerineBiologyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hyaline layer is an apically located extraembryonic matrix, which blankets the sea urchin embryo. Using gelatin substrate gel zymography, we have identified a number of gelatin-cleaving activities within the hyaline layer and defined a precursor-product processing pathway which leads to the appearance of 40- and 38-kDa activities coincident with the loss of a 50-kDa species. Proteolytic processing of the precursor required the presence of both CaCl2 and NaCl at concentrations similar to those found in sea water. The cleavage activities utilized both sea urchin and rat tail tendon gelatins as substrates but demonstrated a species-specific cleavage activity towards sea urchin collagen. The gelatin-cleaving activities were refractory to inhibition by 1,10-phenanthroline but were inhibited by benzamidine. This latter result defines the serine protease nature of the cleavage activities. Both the 40- and 38-kDa activities were found to comigrate with gelatin-cleaving activities present in the sea urchin embryo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular BiochemistrySame topicProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsFrench-language works237,207