Two-pulse control of Raman scattering in liquid methanol: The dominance of classical nonlinear optical effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experimental results on adaptive feedback control of transient (i.e., nonimpulsive) Stokes emission in liquid methanol [Pearson and Bucksbaum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 243003 (2004)] are analyzed. In the experiment, a pump pulse comprising two frequency-shifted Gaussian pulses was used to control the ratio of two Stokes emission lines by varying the relative phase ${\ensuremath{\phi}}_{L}$ between the pulses. Extending the theory of stimulated Raman scattering to accommodate two coupled levels, we show that control of this type is possible, in the strongly driven regime, using Raman coupling alone. Control via variation of ${\ensuremath{\phi}}_{L}$ is shown to also result from self- and cross-phase-modulation of the pump and Stokes pulses as well as via the focused-beam geometry of the pump pulse. In all cases, the general control mechanism is nonlinear optical modulation between the pump and the Stokes pulse; no coherent quantum interference effects are involved. Finally, although the vibrational populations are affected by the same control mechanisms that affect the Stokes spectra, the ratio of the Stokes spectra peak heights does not directly reflect the ratio of the level populations, as was assumed in the experiment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".