Role of chemical communication and behavioural interactions among conspecifics in the choice of shelters by the cave-dwelling salamander <i>Proteus anguinus</i> (Caudata, Proteidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-sexually active males and females of the cave-dwelling salamander Proteus anguinus always aggregate in the same shelters, either under stones or in fissures. However, it was not known if this behaviour results from chemical communication and (or) behavioural interactions among conspecifics. I tested the hypothesis that this is the case by using two-choice tests. The results showed that salamanders re-located their own shelter even when it was displaced. However, they preferred a shelter that belonged to a conspecific or contained faecal pellets of a conspecific to their own or a control "blank" shelter. When two salamanders were simultaneously given the choice between two blank shelters, they cohabited. When they were simultaneously given the choice between their own shelter and each other's, they used them indiscriminately and frequently cohabited. These data provide evidence that P. anguinus use chemical signals as directional cues for homing and also for social behaviour. Chemical signals may attract conspecifics, which subsequently may exhibit gregarious behaviour by occupying common shelters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".