MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Low Lumbar Spine Below Cotrel–Dubousset Instrumentation

2000· article· en· W2087212481 on OpenAlexaff
Francisco Sánchez Pérez-Grueso, Nicomedes Fernández-Baíllo, S. Arauz de Robles, Alfredo García‐Fernández

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsHyperion Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineScoliosisSagittal planeRadiographyMagnetic resonance imagingLumbarSpinal fusionSurgeryLow back painCoronal planeRachisLumbosacral jointLordosisRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of long instrumented fusions down to the low lumbar spine for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the use of instrumentation systems that preserve the sagittal profile could reduce the incidence of early degenerative changes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Long fusions and distractive Harrington instrumentation in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are known to produce pain and degenerative changes in the free lumbar segments. Reports on the use of Cotrel-Dubousett instrumentation (CDI) confirm that the instrumentation maintains physiologic lumbar lordosis, but the evolution of the spine below the fusion is not addressed. METHOD: Thirty-five patients with AIS and CDI were studied. Their spines were fused to L3 or lower, and they had a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Radiologic measurements were recorded from frontal and lateral radiographs. At the time of last examination, lateral flexion-extension dynamic radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging evaluated the health of the disks below the fusion. Clinical outcome was assessed with the Scoliosis Research Society instrument. A control group consisting of 35 peers without scoliosis served as a reference for the outcome questionnaire. RESULTS: Surgery kept the sagittal profile in a physiologic range. All but two patients were satisfied with the results of surgery. There were no differences between patients and control group insofar as pain, self-image, general function, and daily activity were concerned. Eleven patients showed instability signs in dynamic radiographs and more than half of patients showed incipient degeneration on magnetic resonance images. These findings are similar to those found in the general population, according to the literature, and could evidence normal aging processes. CONCLUSIONS: Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation maintains the physiologic sagittal contour. Although there are some degenerative changes in magnetic resonance images and dynamic radiographs, the quality of life and daily activities of the patients after surgery are similar to those of a normal population of the same age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207