Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Académie de Montréal (1778) est la première société intellectuelle fondée par des hommes de lettres au Canada. Son activité se manifeste uniquement dans le premier journal unilingue français du pays, la Gazette Littéraire de Montréal (1778-1779), fondé par l’imprimeur Fleury Mesplet. Son principal collaborateur, l’avocat Valentin Jautard, publie des critiques littéraires entre autres sous le pseudonyme du Spectateur tranquille. À la fin du XVIIIe siècle, il n’y a pas véritablement de champ littéraire au Québec et pourtant, l’imprimeur et le journaliste, membres de l’Académie, agissent comme s’il en existait un. Cet article cherche à démontrer que le lien étroit qui unit le journal et l’académie sous-tend en fait une stratégie — qu’elle participe du registre de la fiction ou qu’elle relève simplement du projet utopique — de la part des animateurs du journal : la présence de l’Académie de Montréal dans la Gazette Littéraire aurait servi à légitimer le discours véhiculé par cette dernière.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".