MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087222801 · doi:10.1080/07060661.2013.871753

Biological studies of three caulimoviruses associated with dahlia (<i>Dahlia variabilis</i>)

2014· article· en· W2087222801 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sahar Eid, H. R. Pappu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDahliaMyzus persicaeBiologySodium bisulfiteInoculationAphidBotanyHorticultureChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two distinct caulimoviruses, Dahlia mosaic virus (DMV) and Dahlia common mosaic virus (DCMV), were found to be associated with dahlia mosaic disease. Additionally, an endogenous caulimovirus, Dahlia variabilis endogenous plant pararetroviral sequence (DvEPRS), was found to be present in many cultivated and wild Dahlia spp. Biological properties including mechanical and aphid transmission were investigated for DMV, DCMV and DvEPRS using Verbesina encelioides (crownbeard) as an experimental host. DMV and DCMV were transmitted by Myzus persicae at the rate of 50 and 73%, respectively. DMV and DCMV were mechanically transmissible to V. encelioides and the two effective buffers for mechanical transmission were phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) with nicotinic acid (1%) and sodium bisulfite (5%). Mechanical transmission rates of 58% and 36% were obtained for DMV and DCMV, respectively. DvEPRS was not transmissible by either aphids or mechanical inoculation. Availability of aphid and mechanical inoculation protocols for DMV and DCMV would facilitate further biological studies on caulimoviruses associated with Dahlia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207