MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087259715 · doi:10.1353/wcw.0.0006

A New World Assemblage: William Carlos Williams and the Québécois Avant-Garde

2007· article· en· W2087259715 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWilliam Carlos Williams Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryAudience measurementFrenchArt historyArtColonialismHumanitiesHistoryLiteraturePolitical scienceLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A New World Assemblage: William Carlos Williams and the Québécois Avant-Garde David Huntsperger In the spring of 1929, Marcel Dugas’ Littérature canadienne. Aperçus (Canadian Literature. Insights) was published in Paris. Though the title would seem to encompass all of Canadian literature, both Anglophone and Francophone, the book functioned primarily as a means to introduce the new Québécois literature of the teens and ‘20s to a French readership. As a central figure in the Québécois avant-garde, Dugas had a keen comprehension of the French-Canadian scene. Moreover, having lived in Paris from 1910 to 1914 and again since 1920, he was acutely aware of the potential for Québécois literature to be dismissed as provincial by metropolitan readers. Thus, he prefaced Littérature canadienne with some cautionary words: “Le lecteur français serait déçu s’il s’attendait à une poésie farouche, sauvage, une poésie de défricheurs, d’ouvriers de la terre, de peauxrouges, ou bien à une sorte de géorgiques québecquoises [sic]. La poésie de maintenant ressemble à celle de la France.” (“The French reader will be disappointed if he expects a wild, savage poetry, a poetry of pioneers, of workers of the land, of redskins, or indeed a sort of Québécois georgics. The poetry of today resembles that of France”; Littérature 6).1 In disavowing a rural poetry rooted in colonial themes and imagery, Dugas was not simply anticipating the preconceptions of his Parisian readership; he was also responding to a regionalist, nationalistic mode that had come to dominate Québécois letters. For Dugas, as for the other poets associated with the Québécois art and literature journal Le Nigog, the widespread influence of the regionalist “terroiristes” stifled the development of Canadian modernism by restricting potential themes and subject matter: . . . [L]a littérature en général au Canada, s’enferma dans des limites très définies. L’histoire de la domination française dans l’Amérique du Nord, [End Page 25] le récit des prouesses des ancêtres français, les destinées du catholicisme, le culte de la France, voilà des thèmes choisis entre tous, dès la première minute où ce peuple prend conscience de lui-même, et que poètes, écrivains, orateurs, journalistes, exploitent avec plus ou moins de réussite. Toute autre inspiration semble bannie. (Dugas, Littérature 3) Literature in general in Canada, encloses itself in very defined limits. The history of French domination in North America, the account of the prowess of French ancestors, the destiny of Catholicism, the cult of France, these are the themes chosen among us, from the first minute that this people became conscious of itself, and that poets, writers, orators, journalists exploit with more or less success. Any other inspiration seems banished. Dugas’ use of the adjective “bannie” (“banished”) is worth noting here, since it describes both his poetry and his life as an expatriate. For Dugas, escaping the influence of regionalism meant escaping Québec itself. Yet not all North American poets of the Lost Generation found the regionalist impulse to be a limit upon artistic freedom. William Carlos Williams, born the same year as Dugas (1883), inherited a similar cultural debt to Europe, but his response to this cultural deficit differed from the reactions of contemporaries like Dugas, Gertrude Stein, Ezra Pound, or T. S. Eliot, all of whom left the New World for the Old. As Christopher Schedler points out, many of Williams’s artistic compatriots decided to emigrate from America “either because it did not possess a ‘culture’ (conceived of as a tradition, a usable past) as Europe did, or because the culture it did possess was dominated by materialism and mechanization (both anathema to the modernist artist)” (34). Williams, however, found a lifelong source of inspiration in the New World heritage that, for Dugas, represented nostalgia for a provincial past and a knee-jerk rejection of literary experimentation. It is not that Williams was indifferent to the European avant-garde or to European literary history. He was well aware of trans-Atlantic Dadaist rumblings, and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.467
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it