MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087295181 · doi:10.2337/diacare.28.3.762-a

Antihypertensive Therapy and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in an Elderly Cohort

2005· article· en· W2087295181 on OpenAlexaff
Raj Padwal, Andreas Laupacis

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Care · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of Alberta
FundersPfizer Health Research Foundation
KeywordsMedicineCensoring (clinical trials)CohortDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesIncidence (geometry)Cohort studyInternal medicineGerontologyDemographyEndocrinologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We thank Chan et al. (1) for their interest in our article and agree that selection bias and a relatively short duration of follow-up (primarily due to a high rate of censoring) are potential limitations to our study. These and other potential limitations are described in detail in our discussion section (2). It should be noted that the cohort was comprised of 76,176 individuals in the primary analysis and 100,653 individuals in the secondary …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes CareSame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207