MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087340032 · doi:10.1186/1471-2431-14-226

Arginine supplementation in prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in the premature infant: an updated systematic review

2014· review· en· W2087340032 on OpenAlexafffund
Kevin Mitchell, Alexander J Lyttle, Harish Amin, Huma Shaireen, Helen Robertson, Abhay Lodha

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Pediatrics · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreFoothills Medical CentreAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsMedicineNecrotizing enterocolitisPediatricsIntensive care medicineEnterocolitisSystematic reviewMEDLINEInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hypoxic-ischemic injury is thought to play a significant role in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Nitric Oxide (NO) is the principal inhibitory neurotransmitter in the gut and is involved in regulation of mucosal blood flow and maintenance of mucosal integrity. NO is synthesized from L-arginine by NO synthases. Our primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of supplemental L-arginine versus placebo in prevention of NEC in preterm infants ≤ 34 weeks gestational age by systematic review of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: This review included RCTs in which L-arginine was administered as a supplement to neonates to prevent NEC. Searches were conducted in OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and CINAHL from their dates of inception to July, 2014. Inclusion criteria were informed parental consent, neonates born at ≤ 34 weeks gestation, and birth weight ≤ 1500 g. Exclusion criteria included neonates with severe congenital anomalies and inborn errors of metabolism. Incidence of NEC was the primary outcome measure. Whole data were analyzed by RevMan 5.1 (Update Software, Oxford, UK). Outcome data were analyzed to determine risk ratios, number needed to treat, confidence intervals, and test for overall effect. RESULTS: Two trials including 425 neonates were eligible for this review. Of these, 235 neonates were included in the study. L-arginine had a 59% reduction in the incidence of stage II and III NEC (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.85, NNT = 9) compared with placebo (P = 0.02). A similar finding was identified for all stages of NEC (60% reduction, RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.69, NNT = 5) (P = 0.001). At age 3 yrs, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of any neurodevelopmental disability (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.23-1.83, P = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: L-arginine supplementation appears to be protective in prevention of NEC in preterm infants and without any significant impact on neurodevelopmental outcomes at 36 months of corrected age. With the addition of the results of one more study to the literature, an intriguing role for L-arginine supplementation continues to gain support. However, large multi-centre RCTs are needed before this can become common practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.006
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PediatricsSame topicInfant Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207