MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087364536 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2014.2362932

Constant Modulus Blind Adaptive Beamforming Based on Unscented Kalman Filtering

2014· article· en· W2087364536 on OpenAlexaff
Md. Zulfiquar Ali Bhotto, Ivan V. Bajić

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterConstant (computer programming)AlgorithmBeamformingControl theory (sociology)Noise (video)Extended Kalman filterAdaptive filterCovariance matrixCovarianceMathematicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An unscented Kalman filter-based constant modulus adaptation algorithm (UKF-CMA) is proposed for blind uniform linear beamforming. The proposed algorithm is obtained by first developing a model of the constant modulus (CM) criterion and then fitting that model into the Kalman filter-style state space model by using an auxiliary parameter. The proposed algorithm does not require a priori information about the process noise and measurement noise covariance matrices and hence it can be applied readily. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm offers improved performance compared to the recursive least square-based CM (RLS-CMA) and least-mean square-based CM (LMS-CMA) algorithms for adaptive blind beamforming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing LettersSame topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207