MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087369411 · doi:10.1139/w01-141

Increased ratio of mitochondrial rDNA to cytoplasmic rDNA during zoosporic and germinating cyst stages of the life cycle of <i>Phytophthora infestans</i> (Mont.) de Bary

2002· article· en· W2087369411 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R París, Lorenzo Lamattina

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaUniversidad Nacional de Mar del PlataConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsBiologyPhytophthora infestansRibosomal RNAMolecular biologySouthern blotRibosomal DNAGeneGeneticsPhylogenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A differential RNA display approach was used to study the gene expression in zoospores (Z) and germinating cysts (GC) of the late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Four differentially amplified cDNAs were selected and cloned. The clone pGPiZ0.5 showed a 2.7-kb transcript highly expressed in Z. A BLAST search revealed an almost full sequence homology (98%) to the P. infestans mitochondrial large subunit rRNA. Northern blot analysis showed a twofold accumulation of the mitochondrial rRNA (mit rRNA) in Z compared with that of GC and mycelia of P. infestans. The high level of mit rRNA in Z might reflect an increased number of gene copies, an increased rDNA transcription rate, or both. Dot blot experiments indicated that the amount of mitochondrial rDNA (mit rDNA) relative to cytoplasmic rDNA is twofold higher in Z and GC than in mycelia. This relatively elevated mit rDNA could explain the high level of mit rRNA in the zoosporic phase. On the contrary, GC conserves the mit rDNA content, but the level of mit rRNA drops to 50% that of Z. The data are consistent with a very active mitochondrial protein synthesis during zoosporic phase, followed by a rapid down-regulation of mitochondrial activity during cyst formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207