Increased ratio of mitochondrial rDNA to cytoplasmic rDNA during zoosporic and germinating cyst stages of the life cycle of <i>Phytophthora infestans</i> (Mont.) de Bary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A differential RNA display approach was used to study the gene expression in zoospores (Z) and germinating cysts (GC) of the late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Four differentially amplified cDNAs were selected and cloned. The clone pGPiZ0.5 showed a 2.7-kb transcript highly expressed in Z. A BLAST search revealed an almost full sequence homology (98%) to the P. infestans mitochondrial large subunit rRNA. Northern blot analysis showed a twofold accumulation of the mitochondrial rRNA (mit rRNA) in Z compared with that of GC and mycelia of P. infestans. The high level of mit rRNA in Z might reflect an increased number of gene copies, an increased rDNA transcription rate, or both. Dot blot experiments indicated that the amount of mitochondrial rDNA (mit rDNA) relative to cytoplasmic rDNA is twofold higher in Z and GC than in mycelia. This relatively elevated mit rDNA could explain the high level of mit rRNA in the zoosporic phase. On the contrary, GC conserves the mit rDNA content, but the level of mit rRNA drops to 50% that of Z. The data are consistent with a very active mitochondrial protein synthesis during zoosporic phase, followed by a rapid down-regulation of mitochondrial activity during cyst formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".