MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087385846 · doi:10.1002/sia.1280

Use of ToF‐SIMS in the study of corrosion processes: Monel 400 steam generator tubing under CANDU start‐up conditions

2002· article· en· W2087385846 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface and Interface Analysis · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIon-surface interactions and analysis
Canadian institutionsKinectrics (Canada)Western University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonelAccelerator mass spectrometryX-ray photoelectron spectroscopySecondary ion mass spectrometryAuger electron spectroscopyChemistryMass spectrometryPressurized water reactorBoiler (water heating)CorrosionNeutron generatorMetallurgyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Generator (circuit theory)Nuclear engineeringRadiochemistryMaterials scienceNuclear chemistryChemical engineeringChromatographyNuclear physicsNeutronWaste managementNeutron temperatureEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This work explores the use of time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry to characterize films on Monel 400 steam generator tubing that has been subjected to simulated CANDU reactor start‐up conditions. The results are compared with those obtained using more traditional techniques, including scanning Auger microscopy and x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it