MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087390421 · doi:10.1002/qua.21948

Heisenberg uncertainty relations can be replaced by stronger ones

2008· article· en· W2087390421 on OpenAlexaff
L. Skála, V. Kapsa

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Quantum Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicHistory and advancements in chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneralizationStatistical physicsUncertainty principleMathematicsQuantumProbability density functionQuantum mechanicsPhysicsStatisticsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Two uncertainty relations, one related to the probability density current and the other one related to the probability density, are derived and discussed. Both relations are stronger than the Heisenberg uncertainty relations. Their generalization to the multidimensional case and to the mixed states is also discussed. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2009

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Quantum ChemistrySame topicHistory and advancements in chemistryFrench-language works237,207