MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Selective Antiepileptic Effects of<i>N</i>‐Palmitoylethanolamide, a Putative Endocannabinoid

2004· article· en· W2087437186 on OpenAlexaff
Aaron H. Sheerin, Xia Zhang, Deborah M. Saucier, Michael E. Corcoran

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalmitoylethanolamidePentylenetetrazolKindlingClonusAnticonvulsantPharmacologyConvulsionEndocannabinoid systemEpilepsy2-ArachidonoylglycerolMedicineCannabidiolChemistryAnesthesiaCannabinoid receptorInternal medicineReceptorAntagonist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether N-palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), a putative endocannabinoid, would be effective against kindled amygdaloid seizures. For a comparison with earlier work, we also tested the effectiveness of PEA against pentylenetetrazol (PTZ)-induced convulsions. METHODS: Kindling electrodes were implanted bilaterally in the amygdala in 32 Long-Evans rats. After the kindling of generalized (stage 5) seizures, the effects of PEA administration [i.p.; 1, 10, 100 mg/kg in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)] were evaluated for anticonvulsant activity. PEA (40 mg/kg, i.p. in DMSO) also was tested for anticonvulsant activity against PTZ-induced convulsions (75 mg/kg, i.p.). RESULTS: After i.p. administration of PEA, kindled rats displayed an increased latency to clonus at the 1-mg/kg dose. No other dose-dependent effects were noted. When tested against PTZ-induced convulsions, PEA protected against tonic convulsions and prolonged the latency between convulsive episodes. CONCLUSIONS: PEA produces antiepileptic effects, but does not completely suppress seizures. The mechanism of action of PEA remains to be defined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchFrench-language works237,207