Electrical stimulation enhances viability of human cutaneous fibroblasts on conductive biodegradable substrates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrically conductive biodegradable polymer membranes were prepared by mixing conductive polypyrrole particles with poly(L-lactic acid) solution followed by solution casting and solvent evaporation. Multi-well electrical cell culture plates were fabricated to host electrically stimulated cell culture and monitor parameters. Human cutaneous fibroblasts were cultured on conductive membranes with or without electrical stimulation (ES). Cell count, MTT, Hoechst staining, and SEM were performed to characterize the cells. The membranes supported the adhesion and proliferation of the fibroblasts in both the presence and absence of ES. In the presence of direct electrical field strength of 100 mV/mm, cell viability on the PPy/PLLA membranes at 2 and 24 h was 2.2- and 4.0-fold (p < 0.05) respectively of that on the same membranes without ES. Direct electrical current ranging from 2.5 to 250 microA/mm had no effect on the viability of cells cultured on the gold-coated Petri dish. Electrical field applied to conductive biodegradable polymer surfaces is therefore an effective approach to upregulate the mitochondrial activity of human skin fibroblasts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it