Effectiveness of GFRP Sheets for Shear Strengthening of Timber
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop a cost-effective shear-strengthening technique for timber stringers that is environmentally friendly and leads to a durable structure. Testing was performed on creosote-treated Douglas fir beams, with dimensions of 100×400×3,650mm , removed from a 40 year old bridge. Two strengthening schemes were investigated; incorporating vertical and diagonal glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) sheets applied to both shear spans. The diagonal scheme proved effective in increasing the average ultimate load, flexural stiffness, and deformability of the beams. Performance of the members reinforced using the vertical scheme, however, was poor compared to diagonally reinforced beams. The contribution of the diagonal sheets to the shear capacity of the stringers was around 12% at service loads and 40% at ultimate load. In conclusion, this study has shown that diagonal GFRP sheets are more effective than vertical sheets in shear-strengthening timber stringers with horizontal splits at their ends.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".