Oligothiophene Functionalized Dimethyldihydropyrenes II: Electrochemical and Conductive Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three different types of oligothiophene functionalized dihydropyrene photoswitches, (A) 2-naphthoyldimethyldihydropyrenes functionalized at the 4,9-positions with oligothiophenes, (B) benzodimethyldihydropyrenes functionalized at the 4-positions with oligothiophenes and the 10(11)-position with oligothienylcarbonyl groups, and (C) benzodimethyldihydropyrenes functionalized at the 4,5-positions with oligothiophenes, were studied with the goal of using the change in pi-conjugation between the open and the closed forms of the dihydropyrene (DHP)-metacyclophane (CPD) switch to control electrical conductivity. UV-vis absorption studies were performed to measure the extent to which the attached thienyl oligomers were conjugated with the switch and the ability of the switch when opened or closed to affect conjugation. Of the three types of switches studied, those of type A showed the greatest effect. Solution cyclic voltammetry (CV) for the closed isomers indicated that the first few oxidation peaks were quasi-reversible, but that later ones were irreversible, leading to polymerization. Solution CV experiments on the open CPD form led to electrochemically induced closing to the DHP form. Conductivity studies were performed on undoped thin films of the A-type compound 4 and showed that opening the switch caused a decrease in electrical conductivity, and closing the switch caused an increase in electrical conductivity through the film. Doped films were studied by dual-electrode voltammetry and spectroelectrochemistry and showed that while doping led to an increase in the conductivity of the film it also led to the closing of the open form, preventing the conductivity of the open doped form from being measured.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".