MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087581377 · doi:10.1017/s0263574704000281

On the maximum dynamic stress search problem for robot manipulators

2004· article· en· W2087581377 on OpenAlexaff
Amar Khoukhi, A. Ghoul

Bibliographic record

VenueRobotica · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsNational Museum of Fine Arts of Quebec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPayload (computing)RobotManipulator (device)Genetic algorithmComputer scienceSpace (punctuation)Mathematical optimizationDynamic problemStress (linguistics)Control theory (sociology)MathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the problem of the dynamic stress optimisation for manipulator robots. The maximum dynamic stress search is a challenging problem, insofar the dynamic stresses change in a very complex manner and they are strongly influenced by the payload, internal parameters of the robot, and instantaneous values of the articular variables (positions, velocities, and accelerations). This problem is solved using a hybrid simplex-genetic algorithm. This algorithm allows solving the dilemma of exploration vs. exploitation in the search space. A simulation study shows the greater performance of the proposed approach as compared to a classical approach of the configuration space inverse sweeping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRoboticaSame topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207