The Role of Inelastic Torsion in the Determination of Residual Deformations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent developments in performance-based seismic design and assessment approaches have emphasized the importance of properly assessing and limiting the residual (permanent) deformations typically sustained by a structure after a seismic event, even when designed according to current code provisions. The performance-based design framework for residual deformations, previously developed by the authors for 2-D regular structures, is further extended to the behavior of 3-D irregular (asymmetric in-plan) buildings. The seismic response of a set of single-story systems, comprising of seismic resisting frames, and modeled to represent alternative materials (concrete or steel), is investigated under uni-directional earthquake loading excitations. Different layouts in plan, leading to either torsionally unrestrained or restrained systems, are considered. The influence of varying torsional restraint is investigated to define how residual diaphragm rotations and center-of-mass displacements are affected by changing levels of stiffness and strength, or mass eccentricity. From these findings additions to the previously proposed estimation procedure are made, with a specific example used to validate the suggested changes. Finally, a general example is developed based on currently available methods of evaluating maximum torsion response. It is suggested that such approaches are likely to be insufficient as they do not explicitly define how seismic-resisting elements are influenced by inelastic torsional response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it