Bibliographic record
Abstract
Juillet 2003 a marqué le 50e anniversaire de la fin de la guerre de Corée (1950-1953), un conflit qui est désigné notamment comme « le point tournant de la guerre froide ». Faisant plus de trois millions de victimes (dont 33 000 Américains), cet épisode a eu des conséquences on ne peut plus importantes pour les États-Unis qui, faut-il le préciser, ont contribué environ pour la moitié de la force onusienne dépêchée sur le terrain. Faire le point sur l’impact socioculturel, économique et politique de ladite guerre sur la nation américaine, tel est l’objectif fondamental de cet article qui repose sur des sources diversifiées. Si le conflit coréen entraîne dans son sillage des retombées non négligeables sur la vie socioculturelle et économique, il ressort toutefois que c’est dans le domaine politique que ses effets s’avèrent certes les plus percutants et durables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".