Tri-iodobenzoic acid affects shoot apical meristem formation and function in zygotic embryos of<i>Brassica napus</i>cv. Topas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of an auxin transport inhibitor, tri-iodobenzoic acid, on the formation and subsequent function of the shoot apical meristem in zygotic embryos of Brassica napus L. was examined. Globular and heart stage embryos were cultured in the presence of tri-iodobenzoic acid. Only embryos at the globular stage of embryogenesis were affected by tri-iodobenzoic acid. Upon treatment, the embryos did not develop two separate cotyledons and, therefore, did not attain bilateral symmetry. Furthermore, the shoot apical meristem of these embryos was altered, as a characteristic tunica-corpus organization was not observed. The cells of the surface layer continued to maintain their meristematic characteristics and divided mainly in the anticlinal direction. The subapical cells differentiated into parenchyma cells and continued to expand such that a corpus organization never developed. Therefore, by the end of the culture period, the shoot apical meristem appeared very broad and shallow. Treated embryos that were transferred to a conversion medium exhibited a dramatic decline and delay in the formation of leaves compared with untreated embryos. Histological observations revealed that the shoot apical meristem continued to expand in width. A low percentage of treated embryos were able to convert; however, leaves were produced from a new shoot meristem that developed in the axillary position. No morphological or histological changes were evident when the embryos were treated later, at the heart stage of embryogenesis.Key words: auxin, Brassica napus, embryo, shoot apical meristem, tri-iodobenzoic acid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".