Feeding Trans Fatty Acids to Rats Has No Effect on the Intestinal Uptake of Glucose, Fatty Acids or Cholesterol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trans fatty acids are produced in the manufacture of margarine, and these hydrogenated fatty acids may have a deleterious effect on the reduction in fasting levels of serum cholesterol anticipated from the feeding of cis polyunsaturated fatty acids. We undertook this study in rats to test the effect of feeding trans fatty acids on the intestinal uptake of glucose, fatty acids and cholesterol. Adult female Wistar rats were fed for 2 weeks semisynthetic, isocaloric diets containing no oleic acid (18:1), cis 18:1 or trans 18:1. There was no difference between the three dietary groups in the animals' food consumption or body weight gain. Rats fed trans 18:1 had an approximately 20% decline in the total weight of the ileum as compared with controls fed no 18:1, and therefore there was also a decline in the percentage of the ileal tissue comprised of mucosa. When comparing rats fed trans 18:1 with those fed cis 18:1 or no 18:1, there was no difference in the uptake of varying concentrations of D-glucose when expressed as nmol.100 mg tissue-1.min-1 or nmol.100 mg mucosal-1.min-1 for jejunum or for ileum. Also, there was no difference in the value of the maximal transport rate (Vmax), Michaelis constant (Km), or the contribution of passive uptake of glucose assessed with L-glucose. There was no diet-associated change in the jejunal or ileal uptake of a medium-chain length fatty acid (lauric acid), a long-chain length saturated fatty acid (palmitic acid), a monounsaturated fatty acid (oleic acid), two polyunsaturated fatty acids (linoleic and linolenic acids), or cholesterol. Thus, we conclude that 2 weeks' feeding of trans fatty acid to rats has no influence on the jejunal or ileal uptake of glucose, fatty acids or cholesterol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".