MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087687758 · doi:10.1115/ipack2011-52161

Enhanced Thermal Map Prediction and Floor Plan Optimization in Electronic Devices Considering Sub-Continuum Thermal Effects

2011· article· en· W2087687758 on OpenAlexafffund
David A. Romero, Aydin Nabovati, Gamal Refai-Ahmed, Daniel P. Sellan, Saeed Ghalambor, Niket Shah, Dereje Agonafer, Cristina H. Amon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsAdvanced Micro Devices
KeywordsThermal conductivityThermalHeat transferFloor planMaterials scienceComputer scienceMechanicsMeteorologyPhysicsEngineeringEngineering drawingComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In current and next-generation semiconductor electronic devices, sub-continuum heat transfer effects and non-uniform power distribution across the die surface lead to large temperature gradients and localized hot spots on the die. These hot spots can adversely affect device performance and reliability. In this work, we propose an enhanced method for thermal map prediction that considers sub-continuum thermal transport effects and show their impact in floor plan optimization. Sub-continuum effects are expressed in terms of an effective thermal conductivity. We introduce and calibrate a 2D thermal model of the die for fast simulation of thermal effects under non-uniform power generation scenarios. The calibrated 2D model is then used to study the impact of the effective thermal conductivity on the thermal map prediction and floor plan optimization. Results show that sub-continuum effects radically change both the predicted thermal performance and the optimal floor plan configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207