Academic mediation: the functions of an electronic discussion list
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le forum de discussion électronique constitue un sous-genre d'évolution récente. Il n'a de ce fait pas encore fait l’objet de l’attention approfondie des linguistes. Cette étude utilise les concepts de Champ, Teneur et Mode, dérivés de la Linguistique Systémique Fonctionnelle, afin d'analyser un corpus de messages envoyés sur la liste sysfling. Au regard du champ, l’étude indique que les fonctions principales sont de donner de l'information, de solliciter de l'information et de répondre à ces sollicitations. Au regard du concept de Teneur, l'acte illocutoire de loin le plus important est de donner de l'information. Au regard du Mode, l’étude révèle des traces du genre épistolaire dans un nombre considérable de messages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it