MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087700323 · doi:10.1145/1838599.1838602

LU factoring of non-invertible matrices

2010· article· en· W2087700323 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM communications in computer algebra · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFactoringInvertible matrixRank (graph theory)Extension (predicate logic)MathematicsMatrix (chemical analysis)Basis (linear algebra)Fraction (chemistry)ComputationAlgebra over a fieldComputer scienceAlgorithmPure mathematicsCombinatoricsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The definition of the LU factoring of a matrix usually requires that the matrix be invertible. Current software systems have extended the definition to non-square and rank-deficient matrices, but each has chosen a different extension. Two new extensions, both of which could serve as useful standards, are proposed here: the first combines LU factoring with full-rank factoring, and the second extension combines full-rank factoring with fraction-free methods. Amongst other applications, the extension to full-rank, fraction-free factoring is the basis for a fractionfree computation of the Moore-Penrose inverse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0080.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it