MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087703695 · doi:10.1109/ias.2011.6074332

Improved dynamic and steady state performance of a hybrid speed controller based IPMSM drive

2011· article· en· W2087703695 on OpenAlexaff
M. Nasir Uddin, Ronald S. Rebeiro

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)TorqueController (irrigation)Electronic speed controlVector controlDirect torque controlMotor driveComputer scienceTransient (computer programming)EngineeringControl engineeringVoltageInduction motorPhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a high performance interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) drive system based on a hybrid intelligent speed controller. Closed loop vector control technique is applied to model the drive system and the hybrid speed controller is designed as a combination of a PI controller with fuzzy inference system. The speed controller is designed in such a way that satisfactory speed and torque responses can be attained in both steady state and dynamic conditions. A flux controller is also incorporated so that both torque and flux of the motor can be controlled while maintaining current and voltage constraints. Thus the proposed drive widens the operating speed limits for the motor and enables the use of the reluctance torque. To investigate the performances in both transient and steady state conditions, the results of the proposed IPMSM drive system are compared with those of the conventional PI controller based drive in simulation. The proposed IPMSM drive is also implemented in real-time using DSP board DS1104 for a laboratory 5 HP motor. Both simulation and experimental results demonstrate the better responses in terms of torque and speed for the proposed drive over a wide speed range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207