Examining the Impact of Strategic Learning on Strategic Agility
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main aim of this study is to examining the Impact of Strategic Learning on Strategic Agility in Elba House Company in Jordan. The study adopts the demonstrative analytical approach to achieve their objectives. A total of (55) individual, (47) were respondents and answered the questionnaire distributed. The study finding that the strategic learning (strategic knowledge creation, strategic knowledge distribution, strategic knowledge interpretation and of strategic knowledge implementation) has significant impact on strategic agility in Elba House Company in Jordan. Therefore, the officials in Elba House Company in Jordan can use the current findings to develop specific plans and strategies for strategic learning based on the objective basis according to the company needs of skills and expertise to develop and improve the performance levels. As well as, Elba House Company in Jordan must owning the strategic vigilance to improve the strategic agility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it