MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087709133 · doi:10.1167/7.9.660

Increasing visual short-term memory load impairs object processing in the left visual field

2010· article· en· W2087709133 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisual fieldNeglectPsychologyCognitive psychologyForgettingWorking memoryVisual short-term memoryVisual memoryNeuroscienceAudiologyCognitionMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After lesions to temporo-parietal regions, patients with visuospatial neglect demonstrate a profound deficit in awareness for contents in the contralateral visual field. Likewise, individuals suffering form extinction demonstrate an impaired awareness for stimuli in one visual field under the presence of bilaterally presented stimuli. While neglect and extinction have traditionally been associated with impaired attentional processing, current models of neglect suggest that it is also associated with a profound deficit in visuo-spatial memory. Interestingly, recent experiments have demonstrated that increases in visual short-term memory (VSTM) load produce decreases in neural activity in the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), the same region associated with neglect. These experiments also demonstrate that this decrease may be associated with inattentional blindness. Here, we tested whether increases in VSTM load could produce deficits in awareness for objects presented on the left visual field. Under a low or high VSTM load, participants had to indicate the number and identities of objects that were briefly presented to the left and/or right visual fields during the memory delay. Results demonstrate that under the high memory-load condition individuals were equally accurate in reporting the number of objects regardless of visual field, or whether objects were presented unilaterally or bilaterally. However, accuracy in reporting the objects' identities was impaired under bilateral presentation relative to unilateral conditions. Interestingly, we also demonstrate that this impairment in object processing was significantly worse in the left visual field compared to the right under high memory load. The results demonstrate that high VSTM load can produce an extinction-like deficit for the recognition of objects in the left visual field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it