MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087709248 · doi:10.7224/1537-2073-5.3.67

Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers Recommendations for Care of Those Affected by Multiple Sclerosis

2003· article· en· W2087709248 on OpenAlexaff
Colleen Harris, Kathleen Costello, June Halper, Jutta Hinrichs, Brian Hutchinson, Anne Naunton, Michael Yeung

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of MS Care · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreMultiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple sclerosisMedicineEmpowermentMEDLINEDiseaseFamily medicineInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An extensive review of the literature, along with knowledge that is derived from education and experience, defined a critical need to recommend care for those affected by multiple sclerosis (MS). On behalf of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, the members of the Clinical Care Committee formulated these guidelines, which delineate their recommendations for minimal expectations of care, including a visual framework for care principles and principles of empowerment, as well as specific recommendations for care of those affected by MS for each phase of the disease. (Int J MS Care. 2003; 5: 67–78.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.334
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.067 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of MS CareSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207