MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087719439 · doi:10.1109/oceans.2003.178326

Hybrid simulation of a distributed control system for the "C-SCOUT" autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV)

2003· article· en· W2087719439 on OpenAlexaff
Samantha Taylor, Neil Bose, Siu O’Young

Bibliographic record

VenueOceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designTroubleshootingRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceArchitectureFlexibility (engineering)Distributed control systemControl systemEmbedded systemDistributed computingControl engineeringReal-time computingControl (management)EngineeringOperating systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. The benefits of distributed control systems have been clearly demonstrated in various applications. The authors have extended this concept to the development of a distributed control architecture for the autonomous underwater vehicle "C-SCOUT". This control system dubbed Distributed Embedded Modular Architecture (DEMA) has shown significant benefits with regards to robustness, reduced power consumption, size efficiency and cost effectiveness. Further to this, the modular nature of the system fits into a larger framework, allowing for enhanced system simulation, configuration flexibility and "hardware-in-the-loop" development. These features are a natural extension of the DEMA controller and result in more efficient development, and ease of troubleshooting, while providing a flexible platform for further refinement of the data interfaces and enhanced hybrid simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492)Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207