Open-door Laminoplasty With Suture Anchor Fixation for Cervical Myelopathy in Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Expansive laminoplasty was developed to achieve posterior spinal cord decompression while preserving cervical spine stability. In the classic Hirabayashi procedure, the lamina door is tethered open by sutures between the spinous process and facet capsule or paravertebral muscle. The authors present a modified technique, which enhances secure fixation and prevents restenosis owing to hinge closure. Twenty-seven patients (7 females, 20 males) with cervical myelopathy secondary to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament were enrolled. Each patient underwent unilateral open-door laminoplasty with suture anchor fixation. Tying and fixation of the sutures onto the holed lateral mass screws was used instead of the conventional method. Radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography scanning were used for imaging studies. The Nurick score was used to assess myelopathy severity, whereas the Japanese Orthopedic Association score was adopted to compare clinical outcome before and after surgery. Mean follow-up period was 38 months (range, 18 to 60). Ten patients had 5 levels of decompression (C3-7), and 17 patients had 4 (C3-6, 12 patients; C4-7, 5 patients). All patients experienced functional improvement of at least 1 Nurick score after surgery. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score increased significantly from 7.5+/-3.2 before surgery to 13.2+/-1.6 at final follow-up. Postoperative radiography and computed tomography scan demonstrated significantly increased sagittal diameter and canal expansion. No neurologic deterioration owing to hinge reclosure or major surgery-related complications were observed. In conclusion, unilateral open-door laminoplasty with suture anchor fixation effectively maintains expansion of the spinal canal and resists closure while preserving alignment and stability. This modified technique has a low complication rate and provides marked functional improvement in patients with cervical myelopathy owing to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".