MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087743236 · doi:10.4000/communication.4503

Le rôle de la communication dans l’éthique organisationnelle

2013· article· fr· W2087743236 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pablo Medina Aguerrebere

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement Theory and Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyMobbingPhilosophyPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les changements sociaux et organisationnels des dernières années ont mené les entreprises à relever plusieurs défis éthiques, comme le stress, la reconnaissance au travail, la souffrance ou encore le mobbing ou harcèlement psychologique. Une solution à ces défis passe par la mise en place opérationnelle d’une culture éthique qui se base sur la communication institutionnelle, laquelle promeut la socialisation des travailleurs, la gestion de leurs émotions et motivations ainsi que le leadership éthique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicManagement Theory and PracticeFrench-language works237,207