MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

T‐cell development, doing it in a dish

2006· review· en· W2087760361 on OpenAlex
Thomas M. Schmitt, Juan Carlos Zúñiga‐Pflücker

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunological Reviews · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphopoiesisBiologyCell biologyCellular differentiationProgenitor cellLineage (genetic)In vitroNotch signaling pathwayProgenitorImmunologyT cellStem cellSignal transductionImmune systemGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thymus provides a unique environment for the development of T lymphocytes from bone marrow-derived progenitor cells. Several environmental factors have been identified that influence the development of T cells in the thymus. In particular, the Notch pathway has emerged as critical for the induction of T-lineage commitment and differentiation. Until recently, however, the precise nature of the thymus-derived signals that drive T-cell development were unclear, and the only reliable in vitro culture system that supported T-cell differentiation required the use of thymus organ cultures. Here, we discuss recent advances in the identification of critical Notch receptor ligands that have facilitated the development of a simple in vitro model for the differentiation of T cells 'in a dish', providing an alternate approach for studying T lymphopoiesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it