MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087778407 · doi:10.1002/chin.200534262

Total Synthesis of (.+‐.)‐Herbindole B and (.+‐.)‐cis‐Trikentrin B.

2005· article· en· W2087778407 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen Jackson, Scott C. Banfield, Michael A. Kerr

Bibliographic record

VenueChemInform · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Biological Evaluation
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesLibrary scienceArt historyChemistryArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herbindole B and <i>cis</i>-trikentrin B are naturally occurring indoles having the unusual and synthetically challenging pattern of carbon substitution\nat the 4−7 and 5−7 positions, respectively, with no substitution at the 1−3 positions. The total syntheses of these polyalkylated indoles have\nbeen achieved in 19 and 12 steps, respectively. The synthesis of herbindole B relies on two iterations of a quinine monoimine Diels−Alder\nreaction, while <i>cis</i>-trikentrin B uses a single cycloaddition of a suitable quinone monoimine. Indolization of the adducts provides suitably\nsubstituted benzopyrrole nuclei for elaboration to the natural products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemInformSame topicSynthesis and Biological EvaluationFrench-language works237,207