Economic Literacy Levels of Social Studies Teacher Candidates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the levels of economic literacy – an important component of being a goodcitizen – among seniors studying at social studies teacher program which aims at cultivating good citizens and to findout its relationships in terms of various variables. The quantitative sample of the study was comprised of 726 seniorteacher candidates studying at Social Studies Teacher Education Program of the universities from seven differentregions in 2013-2014 academic year. The qualitative sample included 436 teacher candidates from the quantitativesample. An Economic Literacy Questionnaire was used to determine the economic literacy levels of teachercandidates and the questionnaire was made up of 3 sections as personal data form, economic literacy test and astudent opinion form on the topics of economic literacy. The results from the study revealed that economic literacylevels of social studies teacher candidates were found to be moderate, which also seemed to be supported by theresponses of teacher candidates. Based on the results, it is thought to be helpful to increase the number of economicsclasses in the undergraduate program in order to the increase the economic literacy levels of teacher candidates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it