MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087799229 · doi:10.2118/2001-085

Residual Oil Saturation Inside the Steam Chamber During SAGD

2001· article· en· W2087799229 on OpenAlex
E. Walls, C. Palmgren, Kenneth E. Kisman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationSaturation (graph theory)ResidualResidual oilEngineeringPetroleum engineeringLibrary scienceGeographyComputer scienceMathematicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The oil saturation inside the steam chamber during steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) has an important impact on economics and conservation. However, the SAGD residual oil saturation is difficult to determine and model because it involves long-term thermal effects and three-phase flow. SAGD has been widely studied and piloted, but improved understanding of long-term drainage effects represents a fundamental issue that requires improved understanding. In the first part of the paper, we present a sensitivity test done on the shapes and the endpoints of the two-phase relative permeability curves. We find that the water relative permeability and oil relative permeability in the gas-oil system are the main factors that determine the magnitude and shape of the oil saturation curve as a function of time. Secondly, we demonstrate how to adjust the krog relative permeability curve to match a theoretically determined residual oil saturation, which is supported by laboratory data. We propose that, during SAGD, the flow of oil can be split into two regimes. In the first regime, close to the edge of the steam chamber, oil drains quickly in a short period of time. In the second regime, oil drains slowly within the steam chamber for a longer period of time as it is produced by "film drainage". To capture these flow regimes, the oil relative permeability curve in the gas-oil system, krog, is split into two. At higher liquid saturations, the first flow regime is represented and at lower liquid saturations, the second regime. Thirdly, the krog curve was adjusted so that the decrease in oil saturation with respect to time closely matched the theoretical curve while maintaining oil production rates expected for SAGD. Using this new curve at different pressures, we show that the residual oil saturation increases at lower SAGD operating pressures. Introduction In a steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process, bitumen drainage occurs mainly along the transition zone, which is the mobile liquid region at the boundary of the steam chamber. Bitumen drainage also continues to occur within the body of the steam chamber over a long period of time such that the residual oil saturation gradually falls. In this paper, the term residual oil saturation refers to the average oil saturation within the steam chamber where the steam chamber includes all grid blocks in a numerical model containing any amount of steam. It is difficult to obtain residual oil saturation data as a function of time in the field so, in this study, we relied on theoretical and laboratory data. We calibrated reservoir simulation results to the theoretical and laboratory data and then used the simulator to investigate the effects of SAGD operating pressures on the residual oil saturation. RELATIVE PERMEABILITY FORMULATION Multiphase flow in a porous medium can be described using Darcy's Law as follows: Equation (1) (Available in full paper) where kr denotes the relative permeability of a phase. Relative permeability is a function of saturation only.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it