MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087824046 · doi:10.2118/0307-0014-jpt

Comments: SPE's New Publication

2007· article· en· W2087824046 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Donnelly

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum industryManagementBoomOfficerVice presidentEconomic shortageHuman resourcesPublic relationsGovernment (linguistics)EngineeringPolitical scienceLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Packaged with this month's JPT is SPE's newest publication, Talent & Technology. Unlike Society publications that focus primarily on technology, Talent & Technology will place more emphasis on the "people" side of the oil and gas industry, covering such issues as the competition for technical talent, the coming "big crew change," the effect of demographic changes on the industry's ability to develop upstream technology, and other matters. The new publication goes hand in hand with 2007 SPE President Abdul-Jaleel Al-Khalifa's theme of "People First," which he has been outlining each month in JPT. Two of the most critical challenges currently facing the industry are how to satisfy growing global demand and how to attract, develop, and inspire the talent the industry needs to meet that demand. The shortage of technical talent has become more obvious during the current industry boom, and persuading graduates to join the oil and gas business has become harder. Several well-known industry executives and experts—including ExxonMobil Senior Vice President Stuart McGill, Marathon Oil President and Chief Executive Officer Clarence Cazalot, PetroSkills President J. Ford Brett, and Total E&P Senior Vice President of Human Resources François Viaud—offer their thoughts on that challenge in the first issue. The new publication will be mailed to all SPE members. Talent & Technology brings to eight the number of printed publications avail-able to members covering various facets of the upstream industry. JPT, which is mailed to all professional members of the Society, is best known, but the others make significant contributions to SPE's mission of technology dissemination and understanding. Publications, SPE's many meetings and conferences, and its website are the main vehicles for the Society's collection and distribution of that information. Two years ago, SPE launched The Way Ahead in recognition of the industry's demographic shift and the growing importance of young professionals in our business. That magazine is sent to SPE members under the age of 35, graduating college seniors, and select member and nonmember executives. Now beginning its third year of publication, it has proved quite popular among younger members and has become not only a learning tool but also a good snapshot of what SPE's young professionals are doing around the globe. That magazine can be viewed online at www.spe.org/web/twa. An important venue for technical information remains SPE's several technical journals that feature papers that have been reviewed and approved by the SPE Editorial Review Committee, an international group made up of more than 400 engineers and scientists. The journals include SPE Drilling & Completion; SPE Production & Operations; SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering; SPE Projects, Facilities & Construction; and SPE Journal. More information about these publications—including how to subscribe, how to access the online versions, and how to submit a technical paper for review—is available at www.spe.org. Later this year, JPT will publish a special issue commemorating SPE's 50th anniversary. That October issue will include stories, photos, and highlights of the past half century in both the Society and the oil and gas industry. If you have information or photos you would like to share with other members in that commemorative issue, please contact me at jdonnelly@spe.org.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207